Other Urban Transit Systems · Maryland

126 Charles County Md

Name: 126 Charles County Md Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

White Plains, MD · ~95 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.4
Avg TCR: 4.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

126 Charles County Md runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Other Urban Transit Systems workplace, earning a grade B.

126 Charles County Md: 2.4 TCR = 54% of Other Urban Transit Systems BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

126 Charles County Md safety composite

126 Charles County Md scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers
DART rate: C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

126 Charles County Md: 1.3 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.48× in 2023

126 Charles County Md's TCR rose 2.2 from 1.3 in 2021 to 3.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485119 · White Plains, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 54% of ind

DART 1.2 DART
RANK P72
PHOTO 009 - Stockton Ca
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 009 - Stockton Ca (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.4
009 - Stockton

2.4
012 - Orlando,

2.4
228 - Gsu Pant

2.4
269 - Ut Shutt

2.4

What this shows 126 Charles County Md averages 2.4 TCR (54% of the Other Urban Transit Systems BLS benchmark).

126 Charles County Md TCR series: 2021=1.3 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 4.5

Where 126 Charles County Md falls in its industry

179 Other Urban Transit Systems establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

126 Charles County Md (95 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.0

126 Charles County Md has more employees than the Other Urban Transit Systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	3.5	1.2	3	0	0
2021	1.3	0.0	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485119 · MD · White Plains

179 Other Urban Transit Systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 16 employers in White Plains, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	009 - Stockton Ca	STOCKTON, CA	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	012 - Orlando, Fl	ORLANDO, FL	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	228 - Gsu Panther Express Ga	ATLANTA, GA	2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	269 - Ut Shuttle Austin, Tx	AUSTIN, TX	2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Trulieve	HANCOCK	95 FTE
STATE-SIZE	WGL MD - Chillum Road	CHILLUM	95 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Nichols Contracting Inc	SANDY SPRING	95 FTE
STATE-SIZE	6901 PENNSY PLNT TRST	HYATTSVILLE	95 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Restore Health Rehabilitation Center	White Plains	113 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Outside The Box Logistics LLC	White Plains	100 FTE
CITY-NEAR	126 - Charles County Md	White Plains	90 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NA-US-MD-White Plains-Hart Place	White Plains	75 FTE
NAT-TCR	Integrated Interiors Inc	Fort Worth, TX	2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Zed Industries, Inc	Vandalia, OH	2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	First National Bank of Moose Lake	Moose Lake, MN	2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Woodville Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Woodville Health and Rehabilitation Center	Woodville, TX	2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Solecta, Inc.	Oceanside, CA	95 FTE
NAT-SIZE	National Service Center - 870	San Antonio, TX	95 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Continental Building Company	Columbus, OH	95 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Ideal Image, Inc.	Englewood, OH	95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.