Respiratory protection mask manufacturing · North Carolina

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations

Monroe, NC · ~503 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Respiratory protection mask manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Respiratory protection mask manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations safety composite

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations: 0.5 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.16× in 2023

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.5 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Monroe, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #6/14
  • PHOTO Cardinal Health of A…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~503 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cardinal Health of Augusta (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Respiratory protection mask manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations TCR series: 2017=0.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where 3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations falls in its industry

555 Respiratory protection mask ma establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 14 Respiratory protection mask ma employers in North Carolina.

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations (503 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations
3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations (503 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

3M Scott Fire and Safety Monroe Operations has more employees than the Respiratory protection mask manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.2 7 1 0
2022 1.0 0.8 4 1 0
2019 1.8 1.6 10 0 0
2018 1.1 0.6 6 0 0
2017 0.5 0.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · NC · Monroe

555 Respiratory protection mask manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 163 employers in Monroe, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Health of Augusta 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&J Medical, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spinal Kinetics LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WSW 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Pipe and Foundry 503 FTE
STATE-SIZE SJP Health Center 504 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-14 505 FTE
STATE-SIZE DLP Harris Regional Hospital LLC 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Plant 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-CHS Union 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-Atrium Health Union 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1108-Atrium Health Union (1108) 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR Red Oak Power. LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida Retail Fabricare Services, Inc 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bindery - BPK 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hupp Toyota Lift 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant L3/LG 503 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Foods of America 503 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stephenville Plant 503 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lahey Clinic North 503 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.