Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · North Carolina

9 Star Logistics

Charlotte, NC · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

9 Star Logistics runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

9 Star Logistics: 15.3 TCR = 339% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

9 Star Logistics safety composite

9 Star Logistics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 8.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.3

2023→2024

9 Star Logistics injury rate improved

9 Star Logistics's TCR fell 13.3 from 21.9 in 2023 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 21.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=21.9 · 2024=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.3 · 339% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #38/50
  • PHOTO DASH GROUP LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DASH GROUP LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

9 Star Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 9 Star Logistics averages 15.3 TCR (339% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

9 Star Logistics TCR series: 2023=21.9 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 4.5

Where 9 Star Logistics falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 50 Delivery service (except as pa employers in North Carolina.

9 Star Logistics (54 employees, TCR 15.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 9 Star Logistics
9 Star Logistics (54 employees, TCR 15.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

9 Star Logistics has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 8.6 4 0 0
2023 21.9 21.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · NC · Charlotte

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DASH GROUP LLC 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZALE 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPEE-DEE DELIVERY SERVICE, INC. - ABERDEEN 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Team Logistics, LLC 15.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ER LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elizabethtown 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Raleigh North 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31045 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Akfar - Fairbanks Center 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Capital City Construction, Inc. 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Sharp Coronado Hospital Hskp 15.3 TCR
NAT-TCR W&P Ventures LLC dba PuroClean of Lafayette 15.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwest Industrial Metals 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turn-Key Solutions, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rumford Stone Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunt & Walsh, Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.