Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins · Tennessee

Advanced Composites TN Plant

Nashville, TN · ~175 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Composites TN Plant runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins workplace, earning a grade B.

Advanced Composites TN Plant: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Composites TN Plant safety composite

Advanced Composites TN Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Advanced Composites TN Plant held a steady TCR band

Advanced Composites TN Plant's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.3 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Nashville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #12/19
  • PHOTO A.Schulman CCNE
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: A.Schulman CCNE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Composites TN Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Composites TN Plant averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Composites TN Plant TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Advanced Composites TN Plant falls in its industry

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blen establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 19 Custom compounding (i.e., blen employers in Tennessee.

Advanced Composites TN Plant (175 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Composites TN Plant
Advanced Composites TN Plant (175 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Advanced Composites TN Plant has more employees than the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.2 2.2 4 0 0
2020 2.9 2.3 4 1 0
2019 2.8 2.3 6 0 0
2016 2.3 0.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · TN · Nashville

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR A.Schulman CCNE 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington Penn Plastic Co., Inc. - V-BAT Division 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RheTech Colors 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sika Advance Resins - Eaton Rapids 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.W. Frierson Contractor, Inc 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scapa Healthcare 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulaski 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creative Foam - Athens 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR MI Distribution 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR H&H Tube 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Constant Aviation- CCM, Cuyahoga County Airport 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Faribault - Public Works Department 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manitou 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cheshire House 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Department of Public Works, Bureau of Street Lighting, Santa Monica Location 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jeffco Health Services, Inc. 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.