Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment · Minnesota

AES Arconic Big Lake

Big Lake, MN · ~125 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AES Arconic Big Lake runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment workplace, earning a grade B.

AES Arconic Big Lake: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AES Arconic Big Lake safety composite

AES Arconic Big Lake scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2018→2020

AES Arconic Big Lake injury rate improved

AES Arconic Big Lake's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.1 in 2018 to 1.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.1 · 2020=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Big Lake, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Phoenix DC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phoenix DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

AES Arconic Big Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AES Arconic Big Lake averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AES Arconic Big Lake TCR series: 2018=2.1 · 2020=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where AES Arconic Big Lake falls in its industry

650 Developing and producing proto establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Developing and producing proto employers in Minnesota.

AES Arconic Big Lake (125 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate AES Arconic Big Lake
AES Arconic Big Lake (125 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

AES Arconic Big Lake has fewer employees than the Developing and producing prototypes for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2018 2.1 0.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · MN · Big Lake

650 Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 31 employers in Big Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phoenix DC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATK Space Systems LLC - Clearfield 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lee Aerospace, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation - ASBU Clearfield 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Golden Valley Svc Ctr (Bldg A) MNGV 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Coon Rapids 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCC-Clearwater 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Limited 849 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2031 Coborn's Big Lake 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Premier Marine LLC 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eggs - Big Lake MN 123 FTE
NAT-TCR Tucker Mechanical, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UNY1 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bourdeau Bros Inc. of Champlain 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerson International, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palomar WDC 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rim Country Health & Rehab. 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glade Valley Center 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lci - 072 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.