Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Maryland

AES Warrior Run

Cumberland, MD · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AES Warrior Run runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

AES Warrior Run: 1.3 TCR = 111% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AES Warrior Run safety composite

AES Warrior Run scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

AES Warrior Run held a steady TCR band

AES Warrior Run's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Cumberland, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.3 · 111% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Miami Fort Power Sta…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miami Fort Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

AES Warrior Run in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AES Warrior Run averages 1.3 TCR (111% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AES Warrior Run TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=3.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where AES Warrior Run falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Electric power generation, fos employers in Maryland.

AES Warrior Run (48 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AES Warrior Run
AES Warrior Run (48 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

AES Warrior Run has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MD · Cumberland

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 58 employers in Cumberland, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miami Fort Power Station 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lamar Power Plant 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hardee Energy Center 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perryman 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turner Roofing Company 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPF LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLN 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE FiberPlus 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Western Maryland 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunter Douglas Fabrication 729 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Woodmark Corp. 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Woodmark Corporation - Allegany Plant 537 FTE
NAT-TCR Alliance Sheets, LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Three Peaks Corp 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercedes Benz of Huntington 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nucor Steel Auburn, Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE EnerSys Advanced Systems Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Related Hybrid Companies LLC 20 Hudson Yards 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Chandler Regional 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Crown Bottling Co. of Winchester, Inc. 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.