Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA

Smithfield, PA · ~78 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA safety composite

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2020

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA injury rate improved

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA's TCR fell 0.6 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Smithfield, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #14/24
  • PHOTO Altoona Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Altoona Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA falls in its industry

474 Foam plastics products (except establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 24 Foam plastics products (except employers in Pennsylvania.

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA (78 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA
Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA (78 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA has more employees than the Foam plastics products (except polystren median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2019 6.7 5.5 6 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.2 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · PA · Smithfield

474 Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 12 employers in Smithfield, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Altoona Plant 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Castle, IN 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferdinand Branch Plant 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Technologies GT 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Manheim Egg 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Penn Natural Gas Archbald 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Homes Building Company, Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bath Saver, Inc. 5 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR 946-NiSource-Smithfield PA-Cust Serv Ctr 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR PA054 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson Matthey Smithfield 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunter Truck - Smithfield 79 FTE
NAT-TCR The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Wabash) 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR C.T. Purcell Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Protein Conversion 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Region 004 Design/Estimating 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ascentria Care Alliance - Client Center 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maui Disposal Company Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sendik's Food Market Elm Grove 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.