Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing · Massachusetts

UFP Technologies GT

Name: UFP Technologies GT Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Georgetown, MA · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UFP Technologies GT runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

UFP Technologies GT: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UFP Technologies GT safety composite

UFP Technologies GT scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers
DART rate: F 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

UFP Technologies GT: 1.9 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.48× in 2021

UFP Technologies GT's TCR rose 3.5 from 1.9 in 2019 to 5.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Georgetown, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

DART 5.3 DART
RANK #5/10
PHOTO Ferdinand Branch Plant
BOOK 2y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ferdinand Branch Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.6
Ferdinand Bran

3.6
Altoona Plant

3.6
New Castle, IN

3.6
Hunter Panels

3.6

What this shows UFP Technologies GT averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

UFP Technologies GT TCR series: 2019=1.9 · 2021=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where UFP Technologies GT falls in its industry

474 Foam plastics products (except establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Foam plastics products (except employers in Massachusetts.

UFP Technologies GT (42 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

UFP Technologies GT has fewer employees than the Foam plastics products (except polystren median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	5.3	5.3	1	0	0
2019	1.9	1.9	1	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · MA · Georgetown

474 Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 12 employers in Georgetown, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Ferdinand Branch Plant	FERDINAND, IN	3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Altoona Plant	ALTOONA, PA	3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	New Castle, IN	NEW CASTLE, IN	3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA	SMITHFIELD, PA	3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Kendall	CAMBRIDGE	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Liberty Utilities Anawan Street	FALL RIVER	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Lendlease Boston	BOSTON	42 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Mass Cabinets Inc.	METHUEN	42 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Mirra Co LLC	Georgetown	245 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Metal Tronics, LLC	Georgetown	79 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cambridgeport	Georgetown	73 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UFPT Georgetown	Georgetown	59 FTE
NAT-TCR	AZ	Tucson, AZ	3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc.	Compton, CA	3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Mercy Health Partners - Sherman Campus	Muskegon, MI	3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Nagel Paper	Swartz Creek, MI	3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Towson Town Center #604	Towson, MD	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	27 Furey Pumps and Filter	Germantown, WI	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	American Sheet Metal	El Cajon, CA	42 FTE
NAT-SIZE	75 Ohlheiser	Newington, CT	42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.