Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Connecticut

Amphenol RF

Danbury, CT · ~97 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amphenol RF runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Amphenol RF: 5.4 TCR = 164% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amphenol RF safety composite

Amphenol RF scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Amphenol RF: 1.9 → 26.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 26.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Amphenol RF's TCR rose 24.6 from 1.9 in 2016 to 26.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Danbury, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 164% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Incon Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Incon Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Amphenol RF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amphenol RF averages 5.4 TCR (164% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amphenol RF TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=26.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Amphenol RF falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Connecticut.

Amphenol RF (97 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Amphenol RF
Amphenol RF (97 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Amphenol RF has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 26.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.0 0.0 0 1 0
2016 1.9 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · CT · Danbury

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 171 employers in Danbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Incon Inc 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HUBER+SUHNER Astrolab 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riversde Electronics - Riverstar Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCB Piezotronics Crystals Facilities 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sarracco Mechanical 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE 570 - Hartford 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rex Lumber Co CT yard 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olin Brass - Somers Thin Strip 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR DANBURY HOSPITAL INC. 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR Board of Education 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western CT Medical Group 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Connecticut Medical Group 1,239 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Outdoors inc 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Auburndale 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GT Technologies, Toledo 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trucchi's Supermarket #6 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industrial Technologies Group (ITG) : Stenograph 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lighthouse of Houston 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE 241 Millennium Hotel, Minneapolis 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williams Construction Arkansas Inc. 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.