Community action advocacy organizations · Minnesota

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc.

Blaine, MN · ~176 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Community action advocacy organizations workplace, earning a grade D.

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 149% of Community action advocacy organizations BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. safety composite

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2024

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. injury rate improved

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 4.0 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813319 · Blaine, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.1 · 149% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #14/36
  • PHOTO SEMCAC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SEMCAC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (149% of the Community action advocacy organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 2.1

Where Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. falls in its industry

81 Community action advocacy orga establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 36 Community action advocacy orga employers in Minnesota.

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. (176 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 147 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc.
Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. (176 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 147 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. has more employees than the Community action advocacy organizations median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 3 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 5 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 5 0 0
2018 5.3 2.0 8 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813319 · MN · Blaine

81 Community action advocacy organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 163 employers in Blaine, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SEMCAC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Admin. Offices Main 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Paul Midway YMCA 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camp Northern Lights 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gardner Builders Companies, LLC 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dianne's Fine Desserts 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEAM Industries, Inc. 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ed Parker 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Estee Lauder - Blaine 669 FTE
CITY-NEAR Infinite Campus, Inc. 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1832 - Blaine 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3498 352 FTE
NAT-TCR ABW Austell 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 207CAR 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Al Pak Labor, Inc. El Centro 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson Gundrilling Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Universidad Ana G. Mendez - Aguadilla 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenyon Plastering of Stockton, Inc. 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMLasPalmas924 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Line Emergency Vehicles 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.