Insulating batts, fills, or blankets made from purchased paper · Michigan

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI

Webberville, MI · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Insulating batts, fills, or blankets made from purchased paper workplace, earning a grade D.

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI: 5.5 TCR = 168% of Insulating batts, fills, or blankets made from purchased paper BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI safety composite

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2017→2021

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI injury rate improved

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI's TCR fell 11.5 from 11.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.5 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=7.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Webberville, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 168% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Hawk Converting, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hawk Converting, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI averages 5.5 TCR (168% of the Insulating batts, fills, or blankets made from purchased paper BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI TCR series: 2017=11.5 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=7.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI falls in its industry

236 Insulating batts, fills, or bl establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Insulating batts, fills, or bl employers in Michigan.

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI (23 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI
Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI (23 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI has fewer employees than the Insulating batts, fills, or blankets mad median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.1 3.5 2 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2017 11.5 3.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · MI · Webberville

236 Insulating batts, fills, or blankets made from purchased paper employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 18 employers in Webberville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hawk Converting, LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Circle, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Felix Schoeller North America, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BUCKEYE PAPER CO INC 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - MIS 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casey Woodwyk, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Schuring, Jr. Company 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atwood Timber and Lumber 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 876 Web1000 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR Webberville Ofc/Whse 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gnutti Carlo USA 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR SA Automotive - Webberville 104 FTE
NAT-TCR 101 Kindleberger 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Butech, Inc. (440) 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Michael Foods - National Pasteurized Eggs 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IHG Army Hotels - Fort Rucker (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging) 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harmony Day Support, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Medical Foundation (185-303) 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Gould Medical Foundation (195-104) 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.