Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Wisconsin

Circle, Inc.

Burlington, WI · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Circle, Inc. runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Circle, Inc.: 5.6 TCR = 168% of Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Circle, Inc. safety composite

Circle, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Circle, Inc.: 0.0 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.34× in 2024

Circle, Inc.'s TCR rose 7.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 7.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Burlington, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 168% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #16/25
  • PHOTO Applegate Insulation…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Circle, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Circle, Inc. averages 5.6 TCR (168% of the Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Circle, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.7 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=11.2 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=7.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Circle, Inc. falls in its industry

236 Paper products (except office establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 25 Paper products (except office employers in Wisconsin.

Circle, Inc. (41 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Circle, Inc.
Circle, Inc. (41 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Circle, Inc. has fewer employees than the Paper products (except office supply), d median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.5 7.5 3 0 0
2023 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2022 11.2 4.5 5 0 0
2021 6.8 4.6 3 0 0
2020 11.7 9.4 5 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · WI · Burlington

236 Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 53 employers in Burlington, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawk Converting, LLC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Felix Schoeller North America, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BUCKEYE PAPER CO INC 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunVest Solar LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mineral Point Operations Bldg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Construction Inc. - Ashland, WI 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger - P&G Green Bay 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Memorial Hospital of Burlington 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle - Burlington 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ardagh Glass Inc Burlington 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Cloacina LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Palm Garden of Tampa, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Rite Store 353 Windsor 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR John Barry School 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE CF Rail Services East Chicago, IN 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Vent Exteriors Inc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE SunRidge Dairy 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gap Inc 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.