General Medical and Surgical Hospitals · California

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002)

Roseville, CA · ~23 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Medical and Surgical Hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002): 5.1 TCR = 68% of General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS 7.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) safety composite

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.4

2017→2021

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) injury rate improved

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002)'s TCR fell 18.4 from 18.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 5.1 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #191/662
  • PHOTO Meriter Hospital
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meriter Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) averages 5.1 TCR (68% of the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) TCR series: 2017=18.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 7.5

Where Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) falls in its industry

6,862 General Medical and Surgical H establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #191 safest of 662 General Medical and Surgical H employers in California.

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) (23 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002)
Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) (23 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5002) has fewer employees than the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.1 7.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 18.4 6.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CA · Roseville

6,862 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meriter Hospital 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mason District Hospital 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center - Neenah 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR UnityPoint Health-Trinity 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Staples promotional products - Marcus, IA 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Radix Wire Plant 1 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carl Walker Construction, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AH4R - Irving 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Applegate Insulation Mfg of MI 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harmony Day Support, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grandview Winnelson 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Augusta Office 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.