Automotive parts, new, merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Arrowhead Engineered Products

Blaine, MN · ~122 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arrowhead Engineered Products runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automotive parts, new, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Arrowhead Engineered Products: 4.8 TCR = 216% of Automotive parts, new, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arrowhead Engineered Products safety composite

Arrowhead Engineered Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2017→2024

Arrowhead Engineered Products injury rate improved

Arrowhead Engineered Products's TCR fell 5.9 from 8.1 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.1 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.0 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423120 · Blaine, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 216% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #6/17
  • PHOTO Memphis Warehouse
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Memphis Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Arrowhead Engineered Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arrowhead Engineered Products averages 4.8 TCR (216% of the Automotive parts, new, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arrowhead Engineered Products TCR series: 2017=8.1 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Arrowhead Engineered Products falls in its industry

950 Automotive parts, new, merchan establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 17 Automotive parts, new, merchan employers in Minnesota.

Arrowhead Engineered Products (122 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Arrowhead Engineered Products
Arrowhead Engineered Products (122 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Arrowhead Engineered Products has more employees than the Automotive parts, new, merchant wholesal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2023 7.9 2.0 4 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.1 2.0 3 0 0
2018 6.2 0.0 6 0 0
2017 8.1 1.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423120 · MN · Blaine

950 Automotive parts, new, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 163 employers in Blaine, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Memphis Warehouse 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercer 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEAMON AND JOHNSON- FRANKLIN 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3140 Keystone Bristol 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Doran Companies LLc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE FHR Pine Bend 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zintl, Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foodservice Northland Cheese - 1036 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Estee Lauder - Blaine 669 FTE
CITY-NEAR Infinite Campus, Inc. 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1832 - Blaine 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3498 352 FTE
NAT-TCR JAD Construction, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookfield Renewable Power Northeast Operations 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Production Plus Plumbing, Inc. Vista Office 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JASPER 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coreslab Structures (L.A) Inc. 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redner's Warehouse Market Joppatown 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shenango Presbyterian SeniorCare 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #22 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.