Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing · Alabama

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02

Huntsville, AL · ~114 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 safety composite

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 held a steady TCR band

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Huntsville, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO Deer Valley - HSEMS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Deer Valley - HSEMS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 falls in its industry

388 Search and detection systems a establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 Search and detection systems a employers in Alabama.

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 (114 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02
BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 (114 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

BAE Systems Electronic Systems HAL02 has fewer employees than the Search and detection systems and instrum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · AL · Huntsville

388 Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 454 employers in Huntsville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Deer Valley - HSEMS 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Mount Laurel Tech Campus (1450) 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Armtec Defense Technologies North Carolina 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UTC Aerospace Systems 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headland GP Shelling Plant 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE DC Equipment, Inc. 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE TAMKO - Tuscaloosa 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial Metal Products 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR AL004 2,929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dynetics A Leidos Company 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leidos - Dynetics 2,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Motor Mfg of Alabama 1,874 FTE
NAT-TCR Rogers Group, Inc 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burrow Global Services, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 00525 North Temple Office 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Springhill Suites Houston Intercontinental AP 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1314-Autograph Distil Louisville Dt 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lone Star Assembly (Challenge Manufacturing Plant 6) 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkwest Casino Lodi 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strider Construction Co 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.