Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · California

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building

Claremont, CA · ~84 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building: 4.2 TCR = 128% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building safety composite

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building: 1.2 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2020

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building's TCR rose 6.1 from 1.2 in 2019 to 7.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Claremont, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 128% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #27/29
  • PHOTO Filconn, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Filconn, Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building averages 4.2 TCR (128% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building TCR series: 2019=1.2 · 2020=7.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 29 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in California.

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building (84 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building
Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building (84 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Baumann Engineering - Cambridge Building has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 7.3 7.3 0 10 0
2019 1.2 1.2 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · CA · Claremont

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 33 employers in Claremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Filconn, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NV 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amphenol Spectra-Strip 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Samtec Cable 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE montalvo farms 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hansen Custom Farming, LLC 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilarides Dairy 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntyre Labor Service, LLC. 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claremont Center 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Claremont Club 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pilgrim Place In Claremont 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Therapak Claremont 197 FTE
NAT-TCR UNIT511 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Symphony of Joliet 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hutchins TX Local 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor Machine Group 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE willow manor 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilbert Industries Inc 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Health Lifestar Ambulance 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE MD Line 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.