Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers · South Carolina

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville

Piedmont, SC · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville: 2.3 TCR = 105% of Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville safety composite

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville: 0.0 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2024

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville's TCR rose 4.6 from 0.0 in 2023 to 4.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Piedmont, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 105% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #10/15
  • PHOTO P. B. Hoidale Co., I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: P. B. Hoidale Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Beard Equipment Company of Greenville averages 2.3 TCR (105% of the Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 2.2

Where Beard Equipment Company of Greenville falls in its industry

911 Materials handling machinery a establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 15 Materials handling machinery a employers in South Carolina.

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville (42 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Beard Equipment Company of Greenville
Beard Equipment Company of Greenville (42 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Beard Equipment Company of Greenville has fewer employees than the Materials handling machinery and equipme median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 2.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · SC · Piedmont

911 Materials handling machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 71 employers in Piedmont, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR P. B. Hoidale Co., Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CK Power Mansfield 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltco Lift Gates 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Transmission Corporation OTP Middletown OH 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Titan Production Company, LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newberry Electric Cooperative,Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Resource Center PNG 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group South Carolina, LLC- Charleston Division 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drive Automotive Industries of America 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Blood Connection 657 FTE
CITY-NEAR PL Developments - OGR Plant 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR C453 Greenville 372 FTE
NAT-TCR Src Roofing, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheraton Fort Worth Downtown Hotel 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunbelt Crushing 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Jamaica 305 Federal Cir 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spinal Technology, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midway 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cranberry 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Endur Contractors, LLC 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.