Water treatment and distribution · California

Bella Vista Water District

Redding, CA · ~27 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bella Vista Water District runs at 318% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Bella Vista Water District: 3.8 TCR = 318% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bella Vista Water District safety composite

Bella Vista Water District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2017→2024

Bella Vista Water District injury rate improved

Bella Vista Water District's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 21.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=21.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.8 · 318% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #58/176
  • PHOTO Portland Water Burea…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Portland Water Bureau Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bella Vista Water District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bella Vista Water District averages 3.8 TCR (318% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bella Vista Water District TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=21.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Bella Vista Water District falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 176 Water treatment and distributi employers in California.

Bella Vista Water District (27 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bella Vista Water District
Bella Vista Water District (27 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Bella Vista Water District has fewer employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 21.6 8.7 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Redding

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Portland Water Bureau Operations 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joshua Basin Water District 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westlands Water District 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 023 CENTRAL DO-WC 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR 1136 NW El Paso 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Infra-Metals Co - Central 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Merrill Equipment Company 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cheat Lake Price Cutter 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bluffton Office 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corey Sly Electrical Service, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Law Enforcement Center 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ackman Glass & Mirror Co Inc 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.