Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Arizona

Belmont Village Scottsdale

Scottsdale, AZ · ~104 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belmont Village Scottsdale runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Belmont Village Scottsdale: 6.3 TCR = 167% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belmont Village Scottsdale safety composite

Belmont Village Scottsdale scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

Belmont Village Scottsdale injury rate improved

Belmont Village Scottsdale's TCR fell 3.7 from 6.1 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=6.0 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=8.4 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Scottsdale, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 167% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #44/109
  • PHOTO LEGACY HOUSE OF LOGAN
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEGACY HOUSE OF LOGAN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Belmont Village Scottsdale in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belmont Village Scottsdale averages 6.3 TCR (167% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belmont Village Scottsdale TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=6 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=8.4 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Belmont Village Scottsdale falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Belmont Village Scottsdale (104 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Belmont Village Scottsdale
Belmont Village Scottsdale (104 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Belmont Village Scottsdale has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2023 8.4 7.2 7 0 0
2022 4.7 1.2 4 0 0
2021 7.9 6.8 6 1 0
2020 8.8 8.8 8 0 0
2019 7.3 6.2 6 1 0
2018 5.3 3.1 6 1 0
2017 6.0 5.0 5 1 0
2016 6.1 4.1 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AZ · Scottsdale

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEGACY HOUSE OF LOGAN 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - East II 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tennyson Assisted Living 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Appalachian Brian Estates 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robbins equipment 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Designs, Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Canyon Manufacturing "Factory 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Britannia Drive 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Scottsdale 4,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS 2,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Refresco Wharton 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Majestic Metals, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 62059 - Capstone Us Foods Tampa Fl 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rollstock 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mercy Hospital-MHN-IA 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mosaic Osceola, IN. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keller Technology Corporation - Huntersville 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patrick Industries/Business Unit 725 MMC 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.