Skilled nursing facilities · Minnesota

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck

New Brighton, MN · ~191 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck: 8.3 TCR = 127% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck safety composite

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck: 4.6 → 55.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 55.4 TCR · DART/TCR 6.41× in 2022

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck's TCR rose 50.8 from 4.6 in 2017 to 55.4 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 6.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · New Brighton, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.3 · 127% of ind

  • DART 53.1 DART
  • RANK #221/430
  • PHOTO LP Lexington, LLC--M…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LP Lexington, LLC--Mayfair (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck averages 8.3 TCR (127% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=10.9 · 2022=55.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #221 safest of 430 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Minnesota.

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck (191 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck
Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck (191 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 55.4 53.1 4 67 0
2021 10.9 10.9 2 12 0
2020 9.3 8.6 6 6 0
2017 4.6 3.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · New Brighton

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 80 employers in New Brighton, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LP Lexington, LLC--Mayfair 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosewood Manor 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northbrook Nursing and Skilled Facilty 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wadesboro Health & Rehab 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Park Construction Company 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kemps Rochester Ice Cream Plant 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zero Zone Refrigeration, LLC 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spectralytics, Inc. 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Construction 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRUMA CORPORATION 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aqseptence Group, Inc.- Johnson Screens 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair Flow Technologies LLC New Brighton 229 FTE
NAT-TCR 1042 Fairbanks 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Genesis - Pompano (MRU3104) 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Keepsake Village of Columbus 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 058046-Vacaville Po 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Scott House 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bright Future Electric - Sarasota 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1236 - Flemington Nj Whse 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE 055376-Newport Beach Po 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.