Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing · Minnesota

Spectralytics, Inc.

Dassel, MN · ~191 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spectralytics, Inc. runs at 252% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Spectralytics, Inc.: 8.3 TCR = 252% of Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spectralytics, Inc. safety composite

Spectralytics, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 23% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

9/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−27.3

2017→2022

Spectralytics, Inc. injury rate improved

Spectralytics, Inc.'s TCR fell 27.3 from 30.3 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 30.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=30.3 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Dassel, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 252% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #44/44
  • PHOTO Beta Bionics, Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beta Bionics, Inc (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Spectralytics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spectralytics, Inc. averages 8.3 TCR (252% of the Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spectralytics, Inc. TCR series: 2017=30.3 · 2018=4 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Spectralytics, Inc. falls in its industry

242 Arc lamp units, electrotherape establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 44 Arc lamp units, electrotherape employers in Minnesota.

Spectralytics, Inc. (191 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Spectralytics, Inc.
Spectralytics, Inc. (191 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Spectralytics, Inc. has more employees than the Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (exce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 1.2 5 0 0
2021 4.7 1.8 6 2 1
2020 2.1 0.7 3 0 0
2019 5.7 2.6 7 4 0
2018 4.0 3.4 6 1 0
2017 30.3 15.2 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · MN · Dassel

242 Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 7 employers in Dassel, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beta Bionics, Inc 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boston Scientific- Alpharetta 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pivotal Health Solutions Watertown 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beta Bionics, Inc. (Irvine, CA office) 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Park Construction Company 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kemps Rochester Ice Cream Plant 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zero Zone Refrigeration, LLC 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro Sales Inc. Burnsville 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDT-Dassel 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR Augustana HC Dassel 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Generations 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dassel Elementary 53 FTE
NAT-TCR Villa at Silverbell Estates 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson House 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fluitron Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR East Northport 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bright Future Electric - Sarasota 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Scott House 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE 055376-Newport Beach Po 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE 081666-Danbury Po 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.