Provision of mass transit rail services · Maryland

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC

Baltimore, MD · ~143 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Provision of mass transit rail services workplace, earning a grade A.

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC: 2.2 TCR = 48% of Provision of mass transit rail services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC safety composite

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC: 2.5 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2018

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC's TCR rose 0.7 from 2.5 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485112 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 48% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO 6091-364
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6091-364 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC averages 2.2 TCR (48% of the Provision of mass transit rail services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=3.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC falls in its industry

71 Provision of mass transit rail establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Provision of mass transit rail employers in Maryland.

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC (143 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC
Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC (143 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Bombardier Transportation - Baltimore - MARC has more employees than the Provision of mass transit rail services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.2 2.4 4 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2016 2.5 2.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485112 · MD · Baltimore

71 Provision of mass transit rail services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6091-364 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Rail Honolulu 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - SUNRAIL 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55868 REDDING 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Drywall, Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vulcan Hart 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2589 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE 178 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR CPI Aerostructures Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sisson Engineering Corp 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LVN - Airport United Airlines Offices 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MO Admin 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE C/P Alaska Ocean 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio Personal Touch Home Aides 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Southborough Gas 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE QPSI Macungie 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.