Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Bostik Wauwatosa

Wauwatosa, WI · ~320 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bostik Wauwatosa runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Bostik Wauwatosa: 0.3 TCR = 8% of Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bostik Wauwatosa safety composite

Bostik Wauwatosa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bostik Wauwatosa held a steady TCR band

Bostik Wauwatosa's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Wauwatosa, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO IFS Industries - War…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~320 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IFS Industries - Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Bostik Wauwatosa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bostik Wauwatosa averages 0.3 TCR (8% of the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bostik Wauwatosa TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bostik Wauwatosa falls in its industry

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, den establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Adhesives (except asphalt, den employers in Wisconsin.

Bostik Wauwatosa (320 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bostik Wauwatosa
Bostik Wauwatosa (320 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Bostik Wauwatosa has more employees than the Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2021 1.2 0.9 4 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2019 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · WI · Wauwatosa

287 Adhesives (except asphalt, dental, gypsum base) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 91 employers in Wauwatosa, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IFS Industries - Warehouse 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willow Lake Corp Admin 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bostik Greenville Nonwoven 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ringwood 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WC Chilton 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weasler Engineering 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6394 320 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 3857 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEHC : Wauwatosa WI, HCS 1,765 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burleigh Campus 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Briggs & Stratton 1,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willie G. Davidson Product Development Center 833 FTE
NAT-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Corporate Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSIC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Experimental Station 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanphere Enterprises / Corporate 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE IKEA #409 Paramus 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Queen Cheese Factory, Inc. 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mission Bell Winery 320 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Louis Service Center 320 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.