Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing · Georgia

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta

Alpharetta, GA · ~218 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta: 7.2 TCR = 218% of Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta safety composite

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2023→2024

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta injury rate improved

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta's TCR fell 1.4 from 7.9 in 2023 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=7.9 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Alpharetta, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 218% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Beta Bionics, Inc. (…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~218 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beta Bionics, Inc. (Irvine, CA office) (0.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Boston Scientific- Alpharetta averages 7.2 TCR (218% of the Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta TCR series: 2023=7.9 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Boston Scientific- Alpharetta falls in its industry

242 Endoscopic equipment, electrom establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Endoscopic equipment, electrom employers in Georgia.

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta (218 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Boston Scientific- Alpharetta
Boston Scientific- Alpharetta (218 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Boston Scientific- Alpharetta has more employees than the Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e. median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 5.3 16 0 0
2023 7.9 7.1 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · GA · Alpharetta

242 Endoscopic equipment, electromedical (e.g., bronchoscopes, colonoscopes, cystoscopes), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beta Bionics, Inc. (Irvine, CA office) 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectralytics, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Molded Products, Inc 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Assembly and Logistics, LLC 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge Mountain Electric Membership 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge John B. Sanfilippo & Son 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Encompass Group LLC , McDonough, GA 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.F. Knox Company, Inc. 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Tierra Rose Care Center 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilbert 10131 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kringle Candle Company 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Enable Utah 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ncrli - Cary 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Newbury Boston 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medical West 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson County nursing home 218 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.