Leather cut stock for shoe and boot merchant wholesalers · Maryland

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center

Curtis Bay, MD · ~222 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Leather cut stock for shoe and boot merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center: 0.5 TCR = 22% of Leather cut stock for shoe and boot merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center safety composite

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center: 0.5 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 0.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.92× in 2024

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center's TCR rose 0.4 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424340 · Curtis Bay, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK P80
  • PHOTO Rocky Brands US, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rocky Brands US, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center averages 0.5 TCR (22% of the Leather cut stock for shoe and boot merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center falls in its industry

30 Leather cut stock for shoe and establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center (222 employees, TCR 0.5) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 136 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 17 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center
Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center (222 employees, TCR 0.5) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 136 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center has more employees than the Leather cut stock for shoe and boot merc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.5 0.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424340 · MD · Curtis Bay

30 Leather cut stock for shoe and boot merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 22 employers in Curtis Bay, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rocky Brands US, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Center Pointe (NFL) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Headquarters 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters -100 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE K&L Microwave 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Marsh 091 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1890 - Prince Georges Plaza 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0208 - WHITE MARSH MD WHSE 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brandon Shores 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manuel Luis Construction Company, Inc./M Luis Products, LLC 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAL-ODFL 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR S03775 - Baltimore Hauling 131 FTE
NAT-TCR BorgWarner Asheville 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Center- Headquarter Employees 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilson Machine and Tool, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lee Building Products (Murfreesboro) 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mitchell County Regional Health Center 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colligere Farm Management 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wausau, WI 222 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZ-Phoenix 222 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.