Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation · New York

Bright Star Messenger Centers

New York, NY · ~77 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bright Star Messenger Centers runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation workplace, earning a grade A.

Bright Star Messenger Centers: 0.3 TCR = 5% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bright Star Messenger Centers safety composite

Bright Star Messenger Centers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

86/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2021

Bright Star Messenger Centers injury rate improved

Bright Star Messenger Centers's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 5% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/356
  • PHOTO CVGGATEWAY
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CVGGATEWAY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Bright Star Messenger Centers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bright Star Messenger Centers averages 0.3 TCR (5% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bright Star Messenger Centers TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Bright Star Messenger Centers falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 356 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in New York.

Bright Star Messenger Centers (77 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bright Star Messenger Centers
Bright Star Messenger Centers (77 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Bright Star Messenger Centers has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NY · New York

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CVGGATEWAY 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quick Delivery Service, Inc 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA Sort Center (Paulsboro) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3.31E+17 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delaney Associates, LP 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lantek Fiber Optic Service, Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vestal Asphalt Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Tunneling -New York 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR AUDUBON 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethlehem Shared Services 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Minneapolis/Rochester, MN HVAC 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rinker ORLCP 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ana Grace Academy of the Arts (Elementary) 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinard Waste 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.