Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing · Michigan

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System

Auburn Hills, MI · ~321 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System: 0.3 TCR = 6% of Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System safety composite

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System held a steady TCR band

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.4 in 2019 to 0.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #5/100
  • PHOTO Setex Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~321 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Setex Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System averages 0.3 TCR (6% of the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System TCR series: 2019=0.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.6 · BLS 5.4

Where AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System falls in its industry

384 Motor vehicle interior systems establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 100 Motor vehicle interior systems employers in Michigan.

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System (321 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System
AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System (321 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

AHHQ - Faurecia Interior System has more employees than the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., he median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.6 0.6 0 2 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Auburn Hills

384 Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Setex Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TS Tech Americas 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KNA Mississippi 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toyota Boshoku America - Regional Headquarters 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren Service Center 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brand Energy Services, LLC - Detroit 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE AJM Packaging - Detroit 321 FTE
STATE-SIZE CWC Textron 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Vyaire Medical - Mettawa 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AUDUBON 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR K049-M001 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bright Star Messenger Centers 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4818-NY11 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6975-1L07 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE 205-DC350 321 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospice of Blue Ash 321 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.