Funds, health and welfare · New York

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds

New York, NY · ~610 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Funds, health and welfare workplace, earning a grade F.

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds: 1.3 TCR = 268% of Funds, health and welfare BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds safety composite

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds: 0.8 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.8 in 2020 to 3.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 525120 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.3 · 268% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P42
  • PHOTO Wilson McShane, Bloo…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~610 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wilson McShane, Bloomington (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds averages 1.3 TCR (268% of the Funds, health and welfare BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds TCR series: 2020=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds falls in its industry

12 Funds, health and welfare establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds (610 employees, TCR 1.3) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 191 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Motion Picture Industry Pension and Health PlansCity of Bridgeport / Health DepartmentSCAN Health PlanCity of Bridgeport Health DepartmentWilson McShane, MissouriWilson McShane, KansasWilson McShane, BloomingtonSCAN GroupBuilding Service 32BJ Benefit Funds
Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds (610 employees, TCR 1.3) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 191 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds has more employees than the Funds, health and welfare median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 0.0 13 0 0
2023 1.2 0.0 2 2 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

525120 · NY · New York

12 Funds, health and welfare employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wilson McShane, Bloomington 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Bridgeport / Health Department 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Motion Picture Industry Pension and Health Plans 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCAN Health Plan 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ortho Clinical Diagnostics - Building 313 610 FTE
STATE-SIZE The New York Botanical Garden 611 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ace Endico Corporation Brewster 611 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clinton County Chapter NYSARC 611 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Kia Country 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Drp Industries Lp 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Terrell High School 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Delta - BNA 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - PHL6 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willamette Valley Medical Center 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISO New England Inc. 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol Myers Squibb Cell Therapy Operations 610 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.