Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Willow Towers

New Rochelle, NY · ~114 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Willow Towers runs at 412% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Willow Towers: 15.7 TCR = 412% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Willow Towers safety composite

Willow Towers scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2016→2023

Willow Towers injury rate improved

Willow Towers's TCR fell 7.4 from 10.9 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 43.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=7.5 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=43.8 · 2022=23.8 · 2023=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · New Rochelle, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 412% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #265/283
  • PHOTO Cedar Lake Village
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cedar Lake Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Willow Towers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Willow Towers averages 15.7 TCR (412% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Willow Towers TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=7.5 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=43.8 · 2022=23.8 · 2023=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Willow Towers falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #265 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Willow Towers (114 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Willow Towers
Willow Towers (114 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Willow Towers has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.6 3.6 4 0 0
2022 23.8 21.1 7 19 0
2021 43.8 43.8 2 39 0
2020 14.6 14.6 1 14 0
2018 7.5 7.5 7 0 0
2017 5.4 5.4 5 0 0
2016 10.9 10.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · New Rochelle

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 48 employers in New Rochelle, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cedar Lake Village 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at The West End 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calusa Harbour 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Eatontown 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Venia Contracting LLC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frank's Commercial and Home Services 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flag Waterproofing and Restoration 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE HP Hood Arkport 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Hebrew Nursing Home 632 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4038-2800 597 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Home for Aged Hebrews 449 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tutor Perini Civil 380 FTE
NAT-TCR Muncipal Services Building 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1780 San Juan Rd. 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR End Zone Logistics 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 115881-Mia-Little River Sta 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Autumn Care of Portsmouth 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE The J E Grote Company, Inc. 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baggett Transportation Company 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #682 (ALBERTSONS MARKET) 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.