General-line groceries merchant wholesalers · South Carolina

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville

Greenville, SC · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General-line groceries merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville: 1.6 TCR = 72% of General-line groceries merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville safety composite

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2022

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2021 to 3.2 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424410 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 72% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #3/30
  • PHOTO Design Pac Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Design Pac Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carolina Bottling Company Greenville averages 1.6 TCR (72% of the General-line groceries merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=3.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Carolina Bottling Company Greenville falls in its industry

1,651 General-line groceries merchan establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 30 General-line groceries merchan employers in South Carolina.

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville (37 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carolina Bottling Company Greenville
Carolina Bottling Company Greenville (37 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Carolina Bottling Company Greenville has fewer employees than the General-line groceries merchant wholesal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424410 · SC · Greenville

1,651 General-line groceries merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Design Pac Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Beth Main 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - BISMARCK 31211 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dot Foods- Dot West Offices 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rainey Generating Station 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fleet/Radio (Columbia) 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Storeroom Operations Center (Columbia) 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Shelving & Mirror #565 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR DSI Holdings Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Medina Farms Lc 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Social Vocational Services #154 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Payco Foods Corp 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Senior Star at Woodland Terrace 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE PMG-Los Lunas 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Surgery Center of Central New Jersey 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Airport Motel 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.