Automotive electrical engine diagnostic equipment manufacturing · Washington
Carter Subaru
Shoreline, WA · ~110 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 5.5
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Carter Subaru runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automotive electrical engine diagnostic equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 5.5
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 7
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Carter Subaru's OSHA Total Case Rate of 5.5 to the Automotive electrical engine diagnostic equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (167% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Carter Subaru's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Carter Subaru falls in its industry
172 Automotive electrical engine d establishmentsSafer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.6.
Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Automotive electrical engine d employers in Washington.
Trend analysis for Carter Subaru
Between 2022 and 2023, Carter Subaru's Total Case Rate improved from 9.0 to 2.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 78% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2023, at a TCR of 2.0, while 2022 saw the highest rate, at 9.0, a spread of 7.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Carter Subaru recorded 7 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 7 injuries, 4 illnesses shown on this page for Carter Subaru are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 334515 - Automotive electrical engine diagnostic equipment manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2023)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 299,794 hours worked = 2.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Carter Subaru (this establishment) | 5.52 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Stroboscopes manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 334515 |
| Washington state avg (all industries) | 6.20 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Carter Subaru to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2023: 3 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 8 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 3 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 9.0 | 7.9 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Carter Subaru's reported OSHA injury record versus its Automotive electrical engine diagnostic equipment manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 167% of the Automotive electrical engine diagnostic equipment manufacturing benchmark, Carter Subaru reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Automotive electrical engine diagnostic equipment manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Carter Subaru's safety grade?
How many injuries has Carter Subaru reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Washington, and by nearby establishments in Shoreline - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~5.5)
Similar size (~110 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.