Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade · Massachusetts

Central Coating Technologies, Inc.

West Boylston, MA · ~71 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Coating Technologies, Inc. runs at 252% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Coating Technologies, Inc.: 8.3 TCR = 252% of Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Coating Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Central Coating Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2019→2024

Central Coating Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Central Coating Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.2 from 11.9 in 2019 to 7.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.9 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · West Boylston, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 252% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Brenham TX - Coating
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brenham TX - Coating (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Central Coating Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Coating Technologies, Inc. averages 8.3 TCR (252% of the Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Coating Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2019=11.9 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=7.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Central Coating Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

646 Coating of metal and metal pro establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Coating of metal and metal pro employers in Massachusetts.

Central Coating Technologies, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Coating Technologies, Inc.
Central Coating Technologies, Inc. (71 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Central Coating Technologies, Inc. has more employees than the Coating of metal and metal products with median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.7 5.1 5 1 0
2023 9.4 5.8 8 0 0
2022 3.7 1.2 2 1 0
2021 8.6 2.5 5 2 0
2020 8.6 8.6 7 0 0
2019 11.9 8.3 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MA · West Boylston

646 Coating of metal and metal products with plastics for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 14 employers in West Boylston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brenham TX - Coating 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversified Coatings 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seaver Finishing 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Folsom NJ 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE OW NA 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - New Bedford Gas 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&J CONTRACTORS, INC. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fred DeRoma & Son, Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2267 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Curtis Industries, LLC 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cogmedix, Inc. 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakdale Rehabilitiation and Skilled Nursing Center 127 FTE
NAT-TCR 304A 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR J.D. Heiskell & Co. Pixley CA 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 502APV 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 58LR 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Missoula 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE All Green New York 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0695 Des Peres 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE WARWICK 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.