Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New Jersey

Central New Jersey

Dayton, NJ · ~878 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central New Jersey runs at 1% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Central New Jersey: 0.1 TCR = 1% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central New Jersey safety composite

Central New Jersey scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

86/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Central New Jersey held a steady TCR band

Central New Jersey's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.1 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Dayton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 1% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/211
  • PHOTO Frederick
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~878 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frederick (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Central New Jersey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central New Jersey averages 0.1 TCR (1% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central New Jersey TCR series: 2018=0.1 · 2020=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Central New Jersey falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 211 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in New Jersey.

Central New Jersey (878 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Central New Jersey
Central New Jersey (878 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Central New Jersey has more employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.1 0.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NJ · Dayton

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 70 employers in Dayton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frederick 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central New Jersey 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CRC Customer Service Center Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond Central 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Apron Linden FC 879 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allies, Inc. 883 FTE
STATE-SIZE Christian Health Care center 871 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3 Cooper/Sheridan Pavilion 870 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Brunswick Sort Center 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZPRN 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 03 437 FTE
NAT-TCR ExxonMobil Global Services Company Houston Campus 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR JCG Industries Inc 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Staff Offices 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eden Prairie Hq Mn 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mary Free Bed Main Campus 878 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ingram Micro Irvine Office 878 FTE
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : Bethlehem IV, PA (GDC) 878 FTE
NAT-SIZE Des Moines (Iades) 878 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.