Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing · New Jersey

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc.

Dayton, NJ · ~474 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 39% of Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. safety composite

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2018→2022

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. injury rate improved

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 2.2 in 2018 to 0.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311930 · Dayton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #6/13
  • PHOTO Prinova Hanover Park
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~474 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prinova Hanover Park (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (39% of the Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. TCR series: 2018=2.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.2 · BLS 4.1

Where International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. falls in its industry

96 Flavoring Syrup and Concentrat establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 13 Flavoring Syrup and Concentrat employers in New Jersey.

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. (474 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate International Flavors and Fragrances Inc.
International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. (474 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 2.6

International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. has more employees than the Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2021 1.7 1.2 9 0 0
2019 2.2 1.1 9 1 0
2018 2.2 2.0 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311930 · NJ · Dayton

96 Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 70 employers in Dayton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prinova Hanover Park 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tastepoint by IFF 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DOHLER NORTH AMERICA 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monin, Inc. Range Road 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE APOC Princeton 474 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJ-Parsippany Engineering 474 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dimensional Merchandising Inc. 475 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shop Rite of Greater Morristown 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central New Jersey 878 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Brunswick Sort Center 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZPRN 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 03 437 FTE
NAT-TCR SYV-ODFL 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Monroe Kut, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jane Westin 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bulldog Factory Service 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pitman Farms, Utah Division 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cincinnati Manufacturing Facility 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Noblesville 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shepherd Parkway Bus Facility 474 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.