Continuing care retirement communities · Arizona

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC

Chandler, AZ · ~63 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC: 10.3 TCR = 272% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC safety composite

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2021

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC injury rate improved

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 23.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=23.7 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Chandler, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 272% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #76/109
  • PHOTO LEGACY HOUSE OF AVON…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEGACY HOUSE OF AVONDALE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC averages 10.3 TCR (272% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=6.4 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=23.7 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 109 Continuing care retirement com employers in Arizona.

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC (63 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC
Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC (63 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Chandler Fairview Partners, LLC has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 23.7 16.6 10 0 0
2019 18.9 18.9 8 0 0
2018 8.7 8.7 4 0 0
2017 6.4 6.4 3 0 0
2016 4.3 4.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AZ · Chandler

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEGACY HOUSE OF AVONDALE 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carolina Estates 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spotsylvania Bickford 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tuscan Gardens of Delray Beach 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Plant 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE MG Building Systems LLC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sollers Central Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Procon Professional Concrete, LLC 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR HSNC, Inc. dba Village Springs Health and Rehabilitation 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Miller's Health Systems 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cavallo Point LLC 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4238-2F3 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Varner Bros. Inc 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAK Port Newark 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanical Systems & Service, LLC 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schneider Electric of Jefferson City LLC 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.