Construction management, commercial and institutional building · New York

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp

Utica, NY · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp: 0.7 TCR = 23% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp safety composite

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2021

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp injury rate improved

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Utica, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/218
  • PHOTO Autumn Contracting, …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Autumn Contracting, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp averages 0.7 TCR (23% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp TCR series: 2016=2 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 218 Construction management, comme employers in New York.

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp (34 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp
Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp (34 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Charles a Gaetano Construction Corp has fewer employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Utica

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Autumn Contracting, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Three Rivers Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Project Blue 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perry-McCall Construction, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Reeves Farms LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenview Dairy LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Farm LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porterdale Farms Inc. 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resource Center for Independent Living 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faxton St. Lukes 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Medical Center 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utica University 915 FTE
NAT-TCR T. E. S. Filer City Station 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ii-Vi Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hayden Wrecking 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tosca - San Bernardino 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greyhound Lines Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vector Tool & Engineering 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bio-Cide International 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avamere at Port Townsend 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.