General warehousing and storage · New Jersey

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center

Dayton, NJ · ~106 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center: 1.5 TCR = 26% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center safety composite

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2020

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center injury rate improved

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.8 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Dayton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 26% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #62/333
  • PHOTO Bose Yuma
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bose Yuma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L'Occitane North American Distribution Center averages 1.5 TCR (26% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center TCR series: 2017=2.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=1 · 2020=2.2 · BLS 5.8

Where L'Occitane North American Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 333 General warehousing and storag employers in New Jersey.

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center (106 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate L'Occitane North American Distribution Center
L'Occitane North American Distribution Center (106 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

L'Occitane North American Distribution Center has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2019 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.8 2.8 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Dayton

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 70 employers in Dayton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bose Yuma 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSD - Holley Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KLS STRYKER TX COM-FM 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - JFK2 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, New Jersey - Cliffwood 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHRIS ANDERSEN ROOFING, A TECTA AMERICA COMPANY, LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Electric, Co. Inc. 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE MMC Contractors Northeast, Inc. 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central New Jersey 878 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Brunswick Sort Center 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZPRN 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Flavors and Fragrances Inc. 474 FTE
NAT-TCR Arhaus LLC - Corporate 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Platinum FLC, Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Charter Dura-Bar Administration 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AVX Filters Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - Corporate 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc. 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE BHE - Pueblo S Victoria Ave (CO010) 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE EnviroLogix Inc. 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.