Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) · California

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego

San Diego, CA · ~33 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) workplace, earning a grade F.

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego: 9.8 TCR = 218% of Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego safety composite

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego: 8.3 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2024

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego's TCR rose 3.1 from 8.3 in 2023 to 11.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 218% of ind

  • DART 11.3 DART
  • RANK #49/75
  • PHOTO Powell Operations - …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Powell Operations - Operators (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego averages 9.8 TCR (218% of the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego TCR series: 2023=8.3 · 2024=11.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego falls in its industry

421 Commuter transit systems, mixe establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 75 Commuter transit systems, mixe employers in California.

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego (33 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego
Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego (33 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego has fewer employees than the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e. median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.3 11.3 1 1 0
2023 8.3 8.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · CA · San Diego

421 Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Powell Operations - Operators 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-2232 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powell Maintenance Building 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Transit Management, Inc 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Collins Jewell Company,Inc. 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 200 Albuquerque 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 10 - Eau Claire 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bronx 1 Day Hab ASP 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jones Welding Company, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE TC Construction, Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reno Ramada 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Machining Concepts LLC 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.