Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Texas

City Transit Management, Inc

Lubbock, TX · ~172 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City Transit Management, Inc runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade F.

City Transit Management, Inc: 9.8 TCR = 217% of Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City Transit Management, Inc safety composite

City Transit Management, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

City Transit Management, Inc: 8.6 → 10.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.99× in 2023

City Transit Management, Inc's TCR rose 2.2 from 8.6 in 2022 to 10.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Lubbock, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 217% of ind

  • DART 9.6 DART
  • RANK #16/16
  • PHOTO Powell Operations - …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Powell Operations - Operators (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

City Transit Management, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City Transit Management, Inc averages 9.8 TCR (217% of the Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City Transit Management, Inc TCR series: 2022=8.6 · 2023=10.8 · BLS 4.5

Where City Transit Management, Inc falls in its industry

421 Local transit systems, mixed m establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 16 Local transit systems, mixed m employers in Texas.

City Transit Management, Inc (172 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate City Transit Management, Inc
City Transit Management, Inc (172 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

City Transit Management, Inc has fewer employees than the Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.8 9.6 17 1 0
2022 8.6 8.1 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · TX · Lubbock

421 Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 482 employers in Lubbock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Powell Operations - Operators 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-2232 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powell Maintenance Building 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Don Oppliger Companies 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Energy Services 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7174-XOM Beaumont 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boyer, Inc. 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR A01 Covenant Medical Center 3,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-20049000 2,269 FTE
CITY-NEAR FALCON HEALTHCARE INC DBA INTERIM HEALTHCARE 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Health System 1,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Pan-O-Gold Baking Company-Oakdale, MN 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 0564 - Hawthorne Ca Bus Ctr 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-State Healthcare Laundry Inc 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0403 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rolex LIC 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ft. Smith Metal 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Samaritan Society Kissimmee Village 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norris Rods 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.