Community recreation programs, government · Minnesota

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation

Rosemount, MN · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Community recreation programs, government workplace, earning a grade B.

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation: 1.7 TCR = 53% of Community recreation programs, government BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation safety composite

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation held a steady TCR band

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Rosemount, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/45
  • PHOTO Virginia Department …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Virginia Department of Energy - Charlottesville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows City of Rosemount Park & Recreation averages 1.7 TCR (53% of the Community recreation programs, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.2

Where City of Rosemount Park & Recreation falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs, establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 45 Community recreation programs, employers in Minnesota.

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation (73 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate City of Rosemount Park & Recreation
City of Rosemount Park & Recreation (73 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

City of Rosemount Park & Recreation has more employees than the Community recreation programs, governmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.8 6.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MN · Rosemount

413 Community recreation programs, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Rosemount, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Virginia Department of Energy - Charlottesville 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Fish & Game (1) 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luscher Farm 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR District 2 - Aiea Complex 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Sleepy Eye 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kellington 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&D Shop - 23405 Ct Rd 10 Corcoran 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE U.S. SiteWork, Inc. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District 196 4,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 917 Rosemount 559 FTE
NAT-TCR Edinburg Office 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nortek Global HVAC Poplar Bluff 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Naval Hopital 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oiltanking Texas City 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Milford Public Schools Hill and Plain 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Coast Terminals - WRF 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE BYB Main 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pines Post Acute & Memory Care 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.