Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Texas

CMC Rebar Dallas

Dallas, TX · ~88 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Rebar Dallas runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade A.

CMC Rebar Dallas: 0.9 TCR = 29% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Rebar Dallas safety composite

CMC Rebar Dallas scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

CMC Rebar Dallas injury rate improved

CMC Rebar Dallas's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.9 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 29% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #24/182
  • PHOTO CMC Rebar Gastonia
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMC Rebar Gastonia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CMC Rebar Dallas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Rebar Dallas averages 0.9 TCR (29% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Rebar Dallas TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Rebar Dallas falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 182 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Texas.

CMC Rebar Dallas (88 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Rebar Dallas
CMC Rebar Dallas (88 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

CMC Rebar Dallas has more employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 1.9 0.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · TX · Dallas

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMC Rebar Gastonia 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SafeRack 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitsubishi Chemical America- ALPOLIC Division 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Building Systems - Texas 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE F AND B HOLDINGS LLC DBA LONE STAR CITRUS GROWERS 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Puirty Texas 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Falcon Energy Services 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Sandy Creek 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC Rebar Gastonia 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Industrial Services LLC - Toledo 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR District Attorney 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Salem Community Hospital Professional Corporation 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kellex Seating Tupelo 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE TotalRecycle, Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seneca Foods Corporation - Mayville 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Municipal Services Division 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.