Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing · California

CMC Steel California

Rancho Cucamonga, CA · ~263 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Steel California runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

CMC Steel California: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Steel California safety composite

CMC Steel California scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CMC Steel California held a steady TCR band

CMC Steel California's TCR held near 0.0 from 3.6 in 2018 to 3.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO Charter Steel- Cleve…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Charter Steel- Cleveland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CMC Steel California in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Steel California averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Steel California TCR series: 2018=3.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Steel California falls in its industry

416 Steel mill products (e.g., bar establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Steel mill products (e.g., bar employers in California.

CMC Steel California (263 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Steel California
CMC Steel California (263 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

CMC Steel California has more employees than the Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, r median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.6 2.1 5 0 0
2019 4.8 3.7 12 1 0
2018 3.6 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · CA · Rancho Cucamonga

416 Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 229 employers in Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Charter Steel- Cleveland 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Globe Metallurgical, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gerdau - Monroe Mill 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unitrac R.R. Materials 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corazon Del Campo 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cabrera Contracting, Inc. 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3225_6213 263 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rancho Royal Oaks, LLC 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 304 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Development Company, Inc. 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUCAMONGA 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR VIP,INC. Rancho Cucamonga 751 FTE
NAT-TCR Bonded Chemicals, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ft. Walton Beach Location 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gentle Harvest 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Boyer's Food Markets -Pottsville 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tosh Pork 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dane County Parent Council dba Reach Dane 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fuyao Glass Illinois, Inc. 263 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ground Effects Sterling Heights 263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.