Instruments, aeronautical, manufacturing · New Jersey

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc

Eatontown, NJ · ~84 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Instruments, aeronautical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc: 0.5 TCR = 14% of Instruments, aeronautical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc safety composite

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc held a steady TCR band

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.4 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Eatontown, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/16
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Gilbert AZ (1390) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc averages 0.5 TCR (14% of the Instruments, aeronautical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc falls in its industry

388 Instruments, aeronautical, man establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 16 Instruments, aeronautical, man employers in New Jersey.

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc (84 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc
Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc (84 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions Inc has fewer employees than the Instruments, aeronautical, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · NJ · Eatontown

388 Instruments, aeronautical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 53 employers in Eatontown, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Gilbert AZ (1390) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nashua, NH 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins Inc (Richardson TX ) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luminar Technologies, Inc. 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE prysmian group 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael J. Wright Construction Company, Inc. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Edison 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allspec Construction, Inc. 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMH Hospitals Corporation 2,235 FTE
CITY-NEAR SubCom, LLC 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR West-Ward Eatontown 342 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monmouth 052 241 FTE
NAT-TCR 4818-OHDB 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Frontier Airlines - Philadelphia Base 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Berea Health and Rehab 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 2573-AZ074 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE OH Field 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peerless Food Equipment 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strack and Van Til Rensselaer 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arkema Inc. Louisville Plant 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.