Water treatment and distribution · Tennessee

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County

Murfreesboro, TN · ~132 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County: 2.5 TCR = 208% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County safety composite

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County: 1.5 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2022

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County's TCR rose 1.9 from 1.5 in 2020 to 3.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Murfreesboro, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 208% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO Aqua Pennsylvania
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aqua Pennsylvania (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County averages 2.5 TCR (208% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County TCR series: 2020=1.5 · 2022=3.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Water treatment and distributi employers in Tennessee.

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County (132 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County
Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County (132 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2020 1.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · TN · Murfreesboro

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 256 employers in Murfreesboro, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aqua Pennsylvania 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Castle Operation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Jersey American Water - Shrewsbury Field Ops 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR A/R Enviromental Technologies 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Public Utility 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Tennessee - Chattanooga 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE HVAC, Inc. 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Murfreesboro 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR TNNAS16 ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA3 1,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA3 1,708 FTE
NAT-TCR Comtech 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Island Newspaper Printing 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR John Soules Foods Gainesville 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnson Matthey Smithfield 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norcold Gettysburg 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lyon & Healy Harps Inc 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solow Building Company - 9 West 57th Street 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Energy Industries - Lockport 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.