Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Johnson Matthey Smithfield

Smithfield, PA · ~137 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Matthey Smithfield runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Johnson Matthey Smithfield: 2.5 TCR = 46% of Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Matthey Smithfield safety composite

Johnson Matthey Smithfield scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2022

Johnson Matthey Smithfield injury rate improved

Johnson Matthey Smithfield's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.9 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=4.6 · 2020=1.7 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Smithfield, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/11
  • PHOTO iKeyless, LLC dba Ca…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: iKeyless, LLC dba Car Keys Express (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Matthey Smithfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Matthey Smithfield averages 2.5 TCR (46% of the Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Matthey Smithfield TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=4.6 · 2020=1.7 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 5.4

Where Johnson Matthey Smithfield falls in its industry

772 Catalytic converters, engine e establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 11 Catalytic converters, engine e employers in Pennsylvania.

Johnson Matthey Smithfield (137 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Matthey Smithfield
Johnson Matthey Smithfield (137 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Johnson Matthey Smithfield has fewer employees than the Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, au median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2017 4.6 3.8 6 0 0
2016 2.9 2.2 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · PA · Smithfield

772 Catalytic converters, engine exhaust, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 12 employers in Smithfield, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR iKeyless, LLC dba Car Keys Express 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yutaka 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Borla Performance Industries 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGK Ceramics USA, Inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blooming Glen Contractors 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dale Construction 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allegheny Millwork PBT 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE HANOVER FULFILLMENT 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR 946-NiSource-Smithfield PA-Cust Serv Ctr 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR PA054 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunter Truck - Smithfield 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunter Panels - Smithfield, PA 78 FTE
NAT-TCR Las Cruses 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PIP Printing 46 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tenneplas 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR John Soules Foods Gainesville 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE IAM 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE iMFLUX Inc. 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poblocki Paving Corp. 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE J & M Plating Inc 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.