Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di · Colorado

Continuum of Colorado

Aurora, CO · ~268 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continuum of Colorado runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di workplace, earning a grade C.

Continuum of Colorado: 4.2 TCR = 111% of Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continuum of Colorado safety composite

Continuum of Colorado scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Continuum of Colorado: 3.9 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2021

Continuum of Colorado's TCR rose 0.7 from 3.9 in 2020 to 4.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Aurora, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 111% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #12/33
  • PHOTO Benchmark-Dayton
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~268 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benchmark-Dayton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Continuum of Colorado in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continuum of Colorado averages 4.2 TCR (111% of the Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continuum of Colorado TCR series: 2020=3.9 · 2021=4.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Continuum of Colorado falls in its industry

1,320 Day care centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 33 Day care centers for disabled employers in Colorado.

Continuum of Colorado (268 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Continuum of Colorado
Continuum of Colorado (268 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Continuum of Colorado has more employees than the Day care centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.6 2.3 8 0 0
2020 3.9 1.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CO · Aurora

1,320 Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 497 employers in Aurora, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Benchmark-Dayton 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Staffing - Chattanooga 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheridan In Home Care 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Inc Schuylkill County PA 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 620-00129 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5232 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interim HealthCare of Southeastern Colorado-Pueblo 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Well Solutions LLC. 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Colorado 6,663 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Aurora_CO 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primoris Renewable Energy 1,695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN5 1,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Richmond Brothers 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Manor Care Health Services Dunedin 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rinker ATLCP 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Erie Hospice 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Building Zone Industries LLC 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE IN Indianapolis 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer Store #19 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE meijer inc 268 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.