Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel · Illinois

Corey Steel Company

Cicero, IL · ~153 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corey Steel Company runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade D.

Corey Steel Company: 4.8 TCR = 147% of Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corey Steel Company safety composite

Corey Steel Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Corey Steel Company held a steady TCR band

Corey Steel Company's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.9 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Cicero, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 147% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Johnstown Facility
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Johnstown Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Corey Steel Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corey Steel Company averages 4.8 TCR (147% of the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corey Steel Company TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Corey Steel Company falls in its industry

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g employers in Illinois.

Corey Steel Company (153 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Corey Steel Company
Corey Steel Company (153 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Corey Steel Company has more employees than the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, pl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.1 2.7 4 2 0
2022 3.2 1.9 5 0 0
2021 8.3 3.2 7 6 0
2020 2.8 2.1 4 0 0
2019 6.7 3.4 7 5 0
2017 3.9 0.0 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · IL · Cicero

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 99 employers in Cicero, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Johnstown Facility 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Falls Facility 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineered Materials Solutions 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jemison Metals DCT 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adjustable Concrete 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE 48130011-FREEMAN EXPO CHICAGO CHICAGO 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Climate Pros Glendale Heights 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phelps Industries LLC 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Breakthru Beverage Illinois, LLC. 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR J. Sterling Morton High School District 201 938 FTE
CITY-NEAR Breakthru Beverage Illinois - Cicero 770 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARYZTA - Cicero 765 FTE
NAT-TCR NHB 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brembo North America, Foundry 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lapeer Comm Schools* 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oncology-Hematology Associates 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Retail East CSC 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stens 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Control Sensors, LLC 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parco, LLC 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.