Orthopedic devices manufacturing · Arizona

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing

Tempe, AZ · ~134 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Orthopedic devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Orthopedic devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing safety composite

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Tempe, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/21
  • PHOTO Exactech Sarasota
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Exactech Sarasota (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Orthopedic devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing falls in its industry

555 Orthopedic devices manufacturi establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 21 Orthopedic devices manufacturi employers in Arizona.

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing (134 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing
Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing (134 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Cranial Technologies Corporate & Manufacturing has more employees than the Orthopedic devices manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · AZ · Tempe

555 Orthopedic devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 569 employers in Tempe, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Exactech Sarasota 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cook Medical 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ETHICON ENDO SURGERY LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stryker JR- Woodale, IL 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riverside Ag Harvesting LLC 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Directional Drilling 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brand Energy Services, LLC - Phoenix 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Mobile storage 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR SALT RIVER PROJECT DISTRICT VALLEY 4,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR 202376 4,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Plants and Offices 4,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Communications, LLC 3,432 FTE
NAT-TCR HBSHSEFL70 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Physician Business Services 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Koppers Clairton 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Augusta General Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant 2376 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100527 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Crosse (Wilac) 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrisburg Air Relief (Pamtl) 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.