Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · Georgia

CSC Atlanta

Conyers, GA · ~93 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CSC Atlanta runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

CSC Atlanta: 9.2 TCR = 278% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CSC Atlanta safety composite

CSC Atlanta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CSC Atlanta held a steady TCR band

CSC Atlanta's TCR held near 0.1 from 4.7 in 2019 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 34.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.7 · 2020=34.6 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Conyers, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 278% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #62/63
  • PHOTO International Paper …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Paper Morristown Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

CSC Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CSC Atlanta averages 9.2 TCR (278% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CSC Atlanta TCR series: 2019=4.7 · 2020=34.6 · 2021=3 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where CSC Atlanta falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 63 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Georgia.

CSC Atlanta (93 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CSC Atlanta
CSC Atlanta (93 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

CSC Atlanta has fewer employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 5 0 0
2023 7.1 5.0 7 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2020 34.6 27.7 6 19 0
2019 4.7 2.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · GA · Conyers

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 137 employers in Conyers, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR International Paper Morristown Container 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Traverse Container-GR 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluted Partition 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9YD Leaman Container Inc. 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE C & H INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benning Construction Company 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Electric Company Inc 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands - Conyers Corporate 1,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Rockdale Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands Lighting Conyers Complex 980 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCDLGATL 627 FTE
NAT-TCR PGS Houston 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Vacation Club Pulse San Diego 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Facilities - Parks Department 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lovelace Women's Hospital 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Siskiyou County Government Center 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sandstone Estates Rehab Center 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pride Mobility Products Pontotoc 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Michael's Hospital Avera 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.