Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance · Louisiana
CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal
Sterlington, LA · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 13.9
- Avg TCR
- 4.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal runs at 309% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 13.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 4.5
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 6
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal's OSHA Total Case Rate of 13.9 to the Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance BLS benchmark of 4.5 (309% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.
Where CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal falls in its industry
1,129 Bulk liquids trucking, long-di establishmentsSafer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.
Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 48 Bulk liquids trucking, long-di employers in Louisiana.
Trend analysis for CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal
Between 2016 and 2017, CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal's Total Case Rate improved from 23.1 to 4.7 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 80% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2017, at a TCR of 4.7, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 23.1, a spread of 18.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal recorded 6 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 6 injuries shown on this page for CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 484230 - Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2017)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 42,452 hours worked = 4.71 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal (this establishment) | 13.89 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Dry bulk carrier, truck, long-distance industry avg | 4.50 | BLS IIF, NAICS 484230 |
| Louisiana state avg (all industries) | 2.92 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2017: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 23.1 | 18.5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal's reported OSHA injury record versus its Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 309% of the Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance benchmark, CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal's safety grade?
How many injuries has CTL 82 Sterlington Terminal reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Louisiana, and by nearby establishments in Sterlington - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~13.9)
Similar size (~23 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.